Amarasekara, I., & Grant, W. J. (2019). Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1), 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518786654

Arora, V., Pendergrast, T., & Jain, S. (2021, January 5). Doctors on social media are being cyberbullied and sexually harassed. It’s time to change that. STAT. https://www.statnews.com/2021/01/05/doctors-on-social-media-are-being-cyberbullied-and-sexually-harassed-its-time-to-change-that/

Besley, J. C., Dudo, A., Yuan, S., & Lawrence, F. (2018). Understanding scientists’ willingness to engage. Science Communication, 40(5), 559–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547018786561

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. (2019). Grundsatzpapier des ­Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung zur Wissenschaftskommunikation.

Cambronero-Saiz, B., Cristófol-Rodríguez, C., & Segarra-Saavedra, J. (2023). Content analysis from a gender perspective of comments received by Spanish Science YouTubers. Media and Communication, 11(1), 252-236. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v11i1.5971

cpy (2022). Chancen gleichen sich nur langsam an. Forschung & Lehre. https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/karriere/chancen-gleichen-sich-nur-langsam-an-5139

Crettaz von Roten, F. (2011). Gender differences in scientists’ public outreach and engagement activities. Science Communication, 33(1), 52–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010378658

Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547008316222

Economist Impact. (2022). Confidence in research: researchers in the spotlight. https://impact.economist.com/projects/confidence-in-research/

Entradas, M., & Bauer, M. W. (2019). Bustling public communication by astronomers around the world driven by personal and contextual factors. Nature Astronomy, 3, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-018-0633-7

Entradas, M., Marcelino, J., Bauer, M. W., & Lewenstein, B. (2019). Public communication by climate scientists: what, with whom and why? Climatic Change, 154(1-2), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02414-9

Fox, J., Cruz, C., & Lee, J. Y. (2015). Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.024

Gosse, C., Veletsianos, G., Hodson, J., Houlden, S., Dousay, T. A., Lowenthal, P. R., & Hall, N. (2021). The hidden costs of connectivity: Nature and effects of scholars’ online harassment. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(3), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1878218

Ho, S. S., Looi, J., & Goh, T. J. (2020). Scientists as public communicators: Individual- and institutional-level motivations and barriers for public communication in Singapore. Asian Journal of Communication, 30(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2020.1748072

Horst, M. (2013). A field of expertise, the organization, or science itself? Scientists’ perception of representing research in public communication. Science Communication, 35(6), 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013487513

Jane, E. A. (2018). Gendered cyberhate as workplace harassment and economic vandalism. Feminist Media Studies, 18(4), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2018.1447344

Jensen, J. D. (2008). Scientific Uncertainty in News Coverage of Cancer Research: Effects of Hedging on Scientists and Journalists Credibility. Human Communication Research, 34(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x

Karliczek, A. (2020). Wissenschaftskommunikation ist Brückenbau. In J. Schnurr & A. Mäder (Eds.), Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft: Ein vertrauensvoller Dialog (pp. 259–264). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Makri, A. (2021). “I had to be with bodyguards with guns” – Attacks on scientists during the pandemic. Nature Medicine, 27(4), 564–567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01314-9

Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 29(5), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259

Nadim, M., & Fladmoe, A. (2021). Silencing women? Gender and online harassment. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865518

Niemi, M. K., & Pitkänen, V. (2017). Gendered use of experts in the media: Analysis of the gender gap in Finnish news journalism. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 26(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515621470

Nogrady, B. (2021). Scientists under attack. Nature, 7880(598), 250–253. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02741-x

Nölleke, D., Leonhardt, B. M., & Hanusch, F. (2023). “The chilling effect”: Medical scientists’ responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Understanding of Science, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221146749

O’Grady, C. (2022). In the line of fire: Scientists have been harassed for years. But a Science survey shows the pandemic has made things far worse for some. Science, 375(6587), 1338–1344.

Otto, D. (2021). Driven by Emotions! The Effect of Attitudes on Intention and Behaviour regarding Open Educational Resources (OER). Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2021(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/jime.606

Pew Research Center. (2014). Online Harassment. http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/10/22/online-harassment/

Poliakoff, E., & Webb, T. L. (2007). What factors predict scientists’ intentions to participate in public engagement of science activities? Science Communication, 29(2), 242–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547007308009

The Royal Society. (2006). Science communication: survey of factors affecting science communication by scientists and engineers. The Royal Society, Research Councils UK. https://wellcomecollection.org/works/ygcfx553

Veletsianos, G., Houlden, S., Hodson, J., & Gosse, C. (2018). Women scholars’ experiences with online harassment and abuse: Self-protection, resistance, acceptance, and self-blame. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4689–4708. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818781324

Yuan, S., Besley, J. C., & Dudo, A. (2019). A comparison between scientists’ and communication scholars’ views about scientists’ public engagement activities. Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 28(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518797002

Ziegler, R., Fischer, L., Ambrasat, J., Fabian, G., Niemann, P., & Buz, C. (2021). Wissenschaftskommunikation in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer Befragung unter Wissenschaftler:innen.